For this article, we’re going to need a unit of measurement that doesn’t exist yet, so let’s define it straight away:
1 cycog1 is an equivalent of one hour of cognitive work by a 130 IQ human.
130 IQ is two standard deviations away from the mean, so one in 40 humans scores that high. That’s around the average IQ for doctors, lawyers, software engineers, etc.
Today, in the US, generally you can buy one cycog for somewhere in the $100-$1000 range. We’re going to be operating in orders of magnitude here, so narrowing it down is not very important.
The proven price floor for a cycog is around $0.001. That’s the cost of electricity consumption for a human brain. You can make arguments about depreciation - each hour of cognitive work relies on years of learning, but let’s ignore that for now. There’s no reason to assume that eventually we won’t have a cognitive architecture cheaper than human brains but by that time our world will have changed so much that even talking about units related to human work might not make sense, so let’s set the floor at $0.001.
GPT-4 is already pretty damn close to a 130 IQ human. It’s not quite there yet, but given the speed of improvement we’ve seen for the last few years, it’s reasonable to assume that we will hit that mark pretty quickly. The costs of running these models are also dropping extremely rapidly. And you can copy a model for free, so the depreciation math shakes out very differently than it does for humans. So it takes very little imagination to picture a world where the price of cycogs is dropping extremely rapidly. In this post, I will try to think through how many cycogs I would consume at different price levels. I will only talk through personal consumption, enterprises are a whole different story.
$100-$1000 (today)
Today, I directly consume a couple of cycogs per month - doctors, lawyers, accountants, etc. There’s tons of indirect consumption - every tool that I use required cycogs to make but let’s focus on just direct consumption.
cycogs consumed = 2/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $600
$10
At every new price level, I would consume all the cycogs I consumed at the higher level, plus some more (assuming my income stays constant, which is a very bold assumption in this world, but let’s roll with it). At $10 per cycog, the main new spend for me would be hiring2 a full-time research assistant for at least a couple of weeks per month (at $400/week it seems very reasonable). I don’t have time to read scientific papers all day every day anymore, and I’m rather sad about it. For example, recently, a new paper about consciousness and the claustrum came out - and I want to go through the paper itself and every single study it cites, but that would take a lot of time I don’t have. I could just tell my research assistant “Here’s what I believe, here are the shapes of arguments about consciousness I find stupid, go through every study this paper cites and provide a summary of how I should update my views”.
cycogs consumed = 83/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $830
$1
At $1 per cycog, things start to get interesting. $100 could buy you:
an MVP of a custom phone app
a REALLY good short story
a design of an experiment
an in-depth financial examination of a publicly-traded business
an always-on coach who is with you most of the time
I would probably buy, on average, one of these (or products of similar difficulty) every month. This roughly equates to executing on a new random idea a little more frequently than once per week - that checks out to me.
cycogs consumed = 583/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $583
$0.1
At this point, $100 would buy you one kilocycog - an equivalent of roughly half a year of cognitive work. What can you do with one kilocycog?
Run experiments equivalent to the amount that goes into a small scientific paper
Write a short book
Have a few doctors of different specialties monitoring all your vitals in real time
Develop an indie video game
This is where we start to run into the territory where the limit becomes how much time I have to consume entertainment. I can’t imagine I’d have time to try more than one indie video game per month, maybe read a couple of books. But also, some of the books I read, I read for the cultural aspect - so they’d still be books that everyone else reads, so not all of them would be custom. I would want the doctor monitoring thing though. And I don’t have ideas for good experiments that often, so guessing I’d top out at 3-4 kilocycogs here.
cycogs consumed = 3583/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $358
$0.01
At one cent per cycog, we get into the custom software territory. $100 gets you a fully developed software product tailored to your exact specifications. At this point, I’d slowly start transitioning from using popular apps - Spotify, Google Docs, etc. to fully custom built software. I probably wouldn’t spend $5,000 in the first month to move over most of my apps, but as I get used to it (and learn my own preferences better), I will probably switch 1-2 apps per month. But also, this is the point where I occasionally begin to splurge on larger entertainment products. A fully custom anime series would cost around $2000 to make, I can see buying 2-3 of those per year. Another thing I do at this point is get something like a 5-person family office to manage my finances.
cycogs consumed = ~100,000/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $1000
$0.001
At the (currently proven limit), making something like your own operating system or your own AAA video game would cost you around $2000. I can’t imagine I’d need software of that magnitude often - but I’d get some every now and then. At this point, I’d probably get entire books written for larks - like a version of Lord of the Rings where the story is told entirely from Gandalf’s point of view, he views the whole ring thing as performance art, and he’s running a drug side hustle having eagles deliver his merchandise across the Middle Earth3. But this is where my imagination starts running into limits - realistically, commissioning work that takes million of hours to make is pretty tricky by itself.
cycogs consumed = ~700,000/month
monthly spend on intelligence = $700
The above numbers net out to a price elasticity of demand for intelligence of about -1. I expect that the general demand will be slightly less elastic than my own because most people are more memetic than me, so they will consume slightly less custom-made stuff.
It’s interesting to me that throughout the process, my predicted spending on intelligence stays roughly within an order of magnitude. It’s also interesting to think about businesses - looking at my consumption patterns, at first knowledge work businesses will benefit from lower costs, but later on, as more and more people get more and more custom stuff done, most knowledge work businesses will just die.
This is obviously a hugely speculative post, so if you have thoughts about your own cycog consumption at different price levels - please share them! I’d love to hear how others think about this.
cycle of cognition
I will use the words hire/buy here interchangeably.
obviously elves get psychedelics, orcs get PCP, dwarves get amphetamines, Rohan has an opioid crisis, and hobbits just smoke weed, though they mostly grow it themselves
Love it! You're asking the right question. I expect you're drastically underestimating the uses for Cycogs that you would discover and want.
As the price declines, you can burn Cycogs on monitoring all the streams of information that are potentially relevant to your life goals, get highly tailored notifications about threats and opportunities related to your goals, preferences, self and loved ones.
Custom news reporting. Customized media consumption recommendations. Custom activity recommendations, things to do in your leisure time that are fun and awesome in all the ways that matter to you. People that you SHOULD meet and who would LOVE to meet you, and that you're going to click with and really enjoy.
Scan all the books, all the articles, all the opinion pieces to find things that are persuasive and well-crafted about the things that you care about.
Not to mention, running businesses for you, taking advantage of your network and reputation and assets to find money-making opportunities for you, so that you can snowball and afford more Cycogs :)
I love the concept of the cycog - and the whole idea here overall - but I don't think the cycog is a very well-defined unit, for the same reason that a horse develops around 15 horsepower*.
When the horsepower unit was invented we were interested in having horses do work; ploughing fields, hauling carriageloads of dainty Austenian maidens, etc., so we were interested in measuring the power a horse could develop when it's working at a level-of-effort it can sustain all day long. The horse's peak power output wasn't really relevant or interesting to anybody, so it wasn't reflected in the unit of measurement. But now we're interested in horsepower as a unit to measure the peak power output of a car, so we're using a unit based around all-day sustained effort to measure instantaneous peak effort. What "this car develops 200 horsepower" means is "at its instantaneous peak output, this car develops power at 200 times the rate at which a horse develops power when the horse is working over the course of a day." (Weird to think about, right?)
Analogously, a clever person who scores 130 on an IQ test (viz. a test upon which they're thinking as hard as they can for a brief space of time) probably isn't applying their entire 130 IQ intelligence to their everyday work, except perhaps on rare occasions. This makes the cycog imperfect in various ways (though still terribly clever and still useful for the purposes of orders-of-magnitude level arguments, of course!)
1) We're defining the cycog in terms of peak output (an hour's 130 IQ work) but using it to measure sustained long-term performance (thousands of hours' work). This leads to an ambiguity: do we have the reciprocal of the 15hp horse situation, where your 130 IQ doctor or engineer delivers 1 cycog across** a 1 hour task but delivers (say) 0.6 cycogs per hour when measured across a task that takes thousands of hours? Or is "the doctineer always delivers exactly 1 cycog per-hour" baked-in to the definition (in which case it's difficult to use the cycog unit to compare tasks that take vastly different durations)?
2) An AI that scores 130 on an IQ test probably *can* apply its entire 130 IQ intelligence consistently across its day-to-day output, leaving us with a definition that makes an AI-cycog worth more than a human-cycog.
If instead we tie the definition of a cycog directly to sustained intellectual long-term output rather than to the peak output of a person (a harder job than the horsepower unit guy had, I admit..) we could mostly avoid these problems.
*With a theoretical maximum of about 25hp (presumably for the Geoff Capes of horses..)
**"Across": obviously you connect the cycogometer to the doctor in parallel.